Cock PunchColfari's Crusade

Cockpunch Of The Week: Attacking Libya, Really President Obama?

All of you knew I had to comment on this bullshit.  I mean, don’t get me wrong, I’m all for blowing up bad guys, but this takes it to a new level.  Why are we involved in Libya in anyway shape or form.  Let me make this as clear as possible.  Rebels in Libya were protesting to force their dictator out.  The very same DICKtator they have supported for 42 years.  So, the DICKtator crushes the revolt with deadly tactics.  (refer to China, 1989 tiananmen square massacre).

As Americans we clearly don’t agree with this type of aggression, nor to we condemn any death or violence, but what is it our business to get involved in another countries internal revolution?  Don’t we have enough wars to fight that we can sit this one out?  And what about Bahrain, Yemen, Jordan, Syria, and Iran?  Are we going to bomb those guys as well?

It’s a simple case of boredom for Western powers.  They haven’t been able to buy more military toys because they aren’t using them, so now between the United States and Great Britain we fired 114 Tom cruise missiles at a low cost of $600,000 each.  So to help rebels we know nothing about in a country that was not threatening us in anyway, the United States government just spent about $68.4 million and that is day one.

The real reason we are helping the rebels in Libya is oil.  Granted, we don’t buy any of the 1.7 million barrels per day produced by Libya, it will still remove most if not all of those barrels from the market for at least one year.  That means high gas prices at the pump for mom and dad.

That is exactly why Obama attacked.  Why not just cut the $.48 cent per gallon gas tax and save the money burned on using our military President Obama?

I want to see Omar Kadafi dead as much as the next guy.  Why cant we just assassinate the guy?

 59 Posts 0 Comments 3674 Views

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *